Reversing the finding of the obvious because the state of the art did not allow itself – Intellectual property

United States: Reversing the discovery of the obvious because the state of the art did not allow itself

To print this article, simply register or connect to

Raytheon Technologies Corp. v General Electric Co., N ° 20-1755 (Fed. Cir. April 16, 2021)

The issue on appeal was whether a prior art reference used in a successful Section 103 obviousness challenge had a “self-empowering” disclosure. The issue arose because of the requirement that the evidence establishes that a skilled craftsman at the time could have made and used the claimed invention.

Here, the prior art reference has been relied on to show evidence of a claimed power density limitation for an engine. The evidence, however, established that the reference’s disclosure was based on the use of non-existent composite materials that could potentially be used for a futuristic engine. Thus, the Federal Circuit reversed the finding of obviousness, concluding that there was no evidence that a skilled craftsman could make and use the claimed invention.

Arguments to the contrary were rejected. It wasn’t a while since the patent challenger presented an expert analysis that a skilled craftsman could have successfully built a
computer model of the claimed engine, as the relevant question was whether the skilled craftsman could build the claimed engine engine. Likewise, it did not matter whether a skilled craftsman would have been motivated to optimize engine characteristics as claimed because, if a “skilled craftsman cannot do [the engine described in the
prior art reference], a skilled craftsman cannot necessarily optimize “the engine to meet the characteristics claimed.”

Read the full decision here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide on the subject. Specialist advice should be sought on your particular situation.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: United States Intellectual Property

Comparative guide to brands

Obhan and associates

Trademark comparison guide for the jurisdiction of India, see our comparison guides section to compare between several countries

Defenses Against a Copyright Infringement Claim

Berman Fink Van Horn PC

One of the main considerations that you or your business should take when receiving a notice of copyright infringement is what defenses you or your business may have against the infringement claim.

Fair Use of Copyright – Context is Everything

Baker botts

In the space of two weeks, the decisions of the Supreme Court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals show the complex nature of the copyright doctrine of fair use and how its contextual application can lead to questions. opposite results.

Intellectual property of the autonomous vehicle

Dickinson Wright PLLC

The speed of technological advancement is driving the evolution of almost all businesses, including autonomous vehicles. Cloud technologies and mobile computing lower the cost of entry.

Source link

About Dela Cruz

Dela Cruz

Check Also

Worldwise: jewelry mogul Diana Widmaier-Picasso’s favorite things

Diana Widmaier-Picasso is much more than a descendant of Pablo Picasso. The art historian, writer …